New Reviews
Of Lord of the Rings: Third Age, which really isn't so hot (and which I enjoyed far more than I really should have), and of
Return to Mysterious Island, which I expected to be a lot worse.
Return to Mysterious Island, which I expected to be a lot worse.
no subject
Grabby fellow. Bwahahahahah!
no subject
no subject
no subject
There should be a project started to digitally insert them where they will bring hope to us all. (I'm not naming names here, but I for one can picture a large white building that would be greatly enhanced by being squish-fodder for that giant statue from Jason and the Argonauts.)
no subject
Plus I'm pretty sure there's been at least one or two Middle Earth games out on PS/2 already. I've noticed a PS/2 game based on The Hobbit knocking around the video game store shelves.
no subject
no subject
1) LotR: Fellowship of the Ring
2) LotR: The Two Towers
3) LotR: Return of the King
4) LotR: The Third Age
5) The Hobbit which is nothing like a LotR game
6) LotR: The Treason of Isengard, which was cancelled.
And none of these hold up to being compared to the SNES Fellowship. *shudder*
no subject
By the way, you're doing pretty well. Tony, a.k.a. Ouberlord, is now using a quote of yours as his .sig file on the WP forum.
no subject
...Say. As long as you're over here, maybe you can offer a bit of help. I've been eyeing an Xbox, because I clearly don't have enough to do gamewise. (Also because I've been looking at Crimson Skies and Panzer Dragoon Orta with deep heartfelt longing for the last year and a half or so, but that's beside the point.) Is a Live account worth maintaining even if I'm not going to use it that often, for game updates and whatnot? Are Live-only content updates common or frequently seen as required?
I know nothing of this console, so I'm a little baffled now that I'm starting to pick up interest.
no subject
I'll warn you now, though, that unless you have the fattest available broadband pipes, Live tends to lag some.
no subject
Mostly.